<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jay Dee&#039;s Post &#187; environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/category/environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net</link>
	<description>The Truth in News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Hearing set on Marsh Fork coal dust case</title>
		<link>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/hearing-set-on-marsh-fork-coal-dust-case/</link>
		<comments>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/hearing-set-on-marsh-fork-coal-dust-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coal Mining Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massey Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work Place Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Members]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Dust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Spokesman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[County Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Filings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developing Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incorrect Address]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirkpatrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marsh Fork Elementary School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massey Energy Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monitoring Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Nuisance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punitive Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raleigh County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Term Exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vicki Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ken Ward Jr. MORGANTOWN, W.Va. (AP) — A Raleigh County judge will hold a hearing later this month on a medical monitoring lawsuit claiming hundreds of children were exposed to toxic coal dust from a Massey Energy Co. processing plant and silo next to Marsh Fork Elementary School. Williamson attorney Kevin Thompson is suing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="post-7723" class="post-7723 post hentry category-coal-pollution category-slurry-impoundments">
<p><a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/files/2009/04/wsmarshfork2.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-501 alignleft" style="margin: 10px;" title="wsmarshfork2" src="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/files/2009/04/wsmarshfork2.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a><small>by Ken Ward Jr.</small></p>
<div class="entry">
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>MORGANTOWN, W.Va. (AP) — A Raleigh  County judge will hold a hearing later this month on a medical  monitoring lawsuit claiming hundreds of children were exposed to toxic  coal dust from a Massey Energy Co. processing plant and silo next to  Marsh Fork Elementary School.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Williamson attorney Kevin Thompson is  suing Virginia-based Massey and three subsidiaries over alleged  exposure from the silo that sits about 235 feet from the school near  Sundial.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Judge Harry L. Kirkpatrick III  granted class-action status to the case in December, but it fell into  limbo because his ruling went to an incorrect address and was returned  to the courthouse in Beckley. Thompson said he only learned of the  ruling after filing a supplemental motion with the court in June, then  calling to follow up.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>The lawsuit, filed on behalf of  Woodrow and Elva Dillon and their two children, accuses Massey and  subsidiaries Goals Coal Co., AT Massey Coal Co. and Massey Coal Services  Inc. of negligence and creating a public nuisance.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>It demands unspecified punitive damages, as well as a court-administered medical monitoring program.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em><span id="more-7723"> </span>Massey has not yet filed a response with the court, and a company spokesman did not immediately comment.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Goals Coal has operated the silo  since November 2003, and the plaintiffs argue more than 300 students and  faculty could have been affected by dust that settled both inside and  outside the school.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>The judge wrote that although he  “remains somewhat skeptical” that many people would participate in the  lawsuit, “the court is willing to accept the representation and see what  develops.”</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>However, Kirkpatrick said he could decertify the class if it turns out to be significantly smaller than claimed.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>The lawsuit was originally filed by  different attorneys in 2005, and the first attempt at class  certification was denied in 2007.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>The case argues long-term exposure puts the class members at greater risk of developing health problems.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Court filings show the plaintiffs  plan to offer expert opinion from Maryland epidemiologist Shira Kramer,  who says coal dust contains substances that have been associated with  cancer, respiratory disease, poor lung function, chronic bronchitis, and  renal, cardiovascular and autoimmune diseases.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>The 70-year-old elementary school  served as a media center during the Upper Big Branch mine disaster that  killed 29 men in April, and it has been the subject of a fierce public  battle for years.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Residents and anti-Massey activists  have long complained about the danger to children and the rest of the  Coal River valley from a dam that sits above the school and holds  billions of gallons of coal slurry.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>In June, the state School Building Authority said it would provide the remaining money needed to replace the school.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Massey and the county school board  each have pledged $1.5 million for the project, and the Los  Angeles-based Annenberg Foundation will donate $2.5 million. Coal River  Mountain Watch, an environmental group, raised $10,400 for the project.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Construction is expected to begin next year.</em></p>
<p><!-- AddThis Button BEGIN --> <script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
//var addthis_append_data = 'false';var addthis_language = 'en';var addthis_options = 'email, favorites, digg, delicious, myspace, google, facebook, reddit, live, more';
// ]]&gt;</script></p>
</div>
</div>
<p>via <a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2010/08/09/hearing-set-on-marsh-fork-coal-dust-case/">Hearing set on Marsh Fork coal dust case « Coal Tattoo</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/hearing-set-on-marsh-fork-coal-dust-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Power plants ‘not making a dent’ in mercury emissions</title>
		<link>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/report-power-plants-%e2%80%98not-making-a-dent%e2%80%99-in-mercury-emissions-%c2%ab-coal-tattoo/</link>
		<comments>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/report-power-plants-%e2%80%98not-making-a-dent%e2%80%99-in-mercury-emissions-%c2%ab-coal-tattoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ameren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Electric Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Fired Boiler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Tattoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drastic Increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limestone County Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nrg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slow Progress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/?p=605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ken Ward Jr. A new report released yesterday by the Environmental Integrity Project warns that power plants are “not making a dent” in their emissions of the potent toxic chemical mercury. There’s a press release online here, and you can read the full report here. According to the report, more than half of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full  wp-image-230 alignleft" style="margin: 10px;" src="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/files/2009/03/coal_power_plant350x3232.jpg" alt="" width="245" height="226" /></p>
<p><small>by Ken Ward Jr.</small></p>
<div class="entry">
<p>A new report released yesterday by the Environmental Integrity  Project warns that power plants are “not making a dent” in their  emissions of the potent toxic chemical mercury.</p>
<p>There’s a press release online <a href="http://www.environmentalintegrity.org/news_reports/news_03_17_10.php">here</a>,  and you can read the full report <a href="http://www.environmentalintegrity.org/news_reports/documents/DirtyKilowatts-Top50MercuryPowerPlantReport.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p>According to the report, more than half of the nation’s 50 worst  power plants in terms of mercury emissions increased those emissions  between 2007 and 2008, the latest year for which data is available.</p>
<p>Among the other findings:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>• Power plant mercury emissions have  actually risen since 2000 (the first year this data was reported) in  several states, including Arkansas, Arizona, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois,  Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Texas, and others.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>• Six Southern Company plants in  Georgia and Alabama are ranked among the top 50 power plant mercury  emitters for overall mercury emissions.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>• Six American Electric Power (AEP)  plants in Texas, Ohio, Indiana and West Virginia are ranked among the  top 50 mercury emitters.   AEP’s Gavin Power Plant in Ohio emitted 937  pounds of mercury in 2008, a 115.4 percent increase from 2007. This  drastic increase in mercury emissions appears to be due largely to a  change in the coal burned at the plant in 2008.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>• NRG’s Limestone County, Texas plant  emitted 1,251 pounds of mercury in 2008, a 4.55 percent increase over  its reported 2007 emissions. NRG is currently constructing a third  coal-fired boiler at this plant.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>• In terms of pounds of mercury  emitted per gigawatt hour, the following companies have three or more  power plants on the list:  Ameren (4); Luminant (4); Reliant (RRI  Energy) (4); Southern Company (4); AEP (3); and NRG (3).</em></p>
<p>Environmental Integrity Project Senior Attorney Ilan Levin said:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Despite years of promises, the  electric power industry has barely made a dent in its mercury emissions  this decade. This slow progress is nowhere near the levels that would be  achieved if all plants installed modern pollution controls.  The  nation’s power plants are not even close to meeting the levels that EPA  forecasted under a weak Bush Administration power plant mercury rule  that was subsequently thrown out by a federal court.</em></p>
</div>
<p>via <a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2010/03/18/report-power-plants-not-making-a-dent-in-mercury-emissions/">Report: Power plants ‘not making a dent’ in mercury emissions « Coal Tattoo</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/report-power-plants-%e2%80%98not-making-a-dent%e2%80%99-in-mercury-emissions-%c2%ab-coal-tattoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dave Matthews Headlines Music Bash to End Mountaintop Removal</title>
		<link>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/dave-matthews-headlines-music-bash-to-end-mountaintop-removal/</link>
		<comments>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/dave-matthews-headlines-music-bash-to-end-mountaintop-removal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coal Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1 Million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appalachia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Water Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Destructive Method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drinking Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groundwater Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headwater Streams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Biggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation Amends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million Acres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mountaintop Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mountaintop Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Bash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restoration Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streams And Rivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wholesale Destruction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/?p=591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 1 million acres of Appalachia have already been destroyed. An estimated 1,200 miles of headwater streams have been buried under tons of mining wastes. Over 500 mountains have been permanently scarred. Homes have been ruined and drinking water supplies contaminated. It is time to end this especially destructive method of coal mining. Our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>More than 1 million acres of Appalachia have already been destroyed. An estimated 1,200 miles of headwater streams have been buried under tons of mining wastes. Over 500 mountains have been permanently scarred. Homes have been ruined and drinking water supplies contaminated. It is time to end this especially destructive method of coal mining.<br />
Our bill, the Appalachia Restoration Act, will make clear that mining wastes cannot be dumped into our streams, smothering them and sending plumes of toxic run-off into groundwater systems. This Cardin-Alexander legislation amends the Clean Water Act, specifically preventing the so-called &#8220;excess spoil&#8221; of mining wastes from entering our streams and rivers. This simple legislation will restore the Clean Water Act to its original purpose. In doing so, it will stop the wholesale destruction of some of America&#8217;s most beautiful and ecologically significant regions. Mountaintop mining produces less than five percent of the coal mined in the United States.</p></blockquote>
<p>Complete story &#8211; <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-biggers/green-concert-of-the-year_b_487282.html">Jeff Biggers: Green Concert of the Year: Dave Matthews Headlines Music Bash to End Mountaintop Removal</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/dave-matthews-headlines-music-bash-to-end-mountaintop-removal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sen. Byrd splits with Rocky IV on bill to block EPA from issuing greenhouse gas limits</title>
		<link>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/sen-byrd-splits-with-rocky-iv-on-bill-to-block-epa-from-issuing-greenhouse-gas-limits/</link>
		<comments>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/sen-byrd-splits-with-rocky-iv-on-bill-to-block-epa-from-issuing-greenhouse-gas-limits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epa Administrator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Factories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Rockefeller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proper Balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protecting The Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert C Byrd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rocky Iv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sen Byrd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Rockefeller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/?p=588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ken Ward Jr. This just in: Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., on why he declined to co-sponsor Sen. Jay Rockefeller’s bill to block EPA from issuing greenhouse gas limits: I do not plan to cosponsor Senator Rockefeller’s legislation at this time.  I was encouraged by the response last week from EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/files/2009/02/byrd12.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-16 alignleft" style="margin: 10px;" src="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/files/2009/02/byrd12.jpg" alt="byrd12" width="280" height="210" /></a><small>by Ken Ward Jr.</small></h3>
<div class="entry">
<p>This just in: Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., on why he declined to co-sponsor Sen. Jay Rockefeller’s <a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2010/03/04/rocky-iv-seeks-more-delay-in-greenhouse-gas-controls-but-offers-no-plan-of-his-own/">bill to block EPA from issuing greenhouse gas limits</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>I do not plan to cosponsor Senator Rockefeller’s legislation at this time.  I was encouraged by the response last week from EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson to a letter that I signed along with other Senators that would delay into next year the application of stronger standards regarding increased efficiency or reduced pollution at large power plants and factories. Following up on my previous conversations with her in my office, I take her at her word.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>In addition, as I have pointed out in my op-ed of December  3, 2009 entitled ‘<a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2009/12/03/sen-byrd-coal-must-embrace-the-future/">Coal Must Embrace the Future</a>,’ West Virginia needs to have a seat at the negotiating table.  I am continuing to have significant discussions about how to ensure the future of coal as a long-term energy resource.  I am reluctant to give up on talks that might produce benefits for West Virginia’s coal interests by seeming to turn away from on-going negotiations.  I will continue to negotiate with all who are earnestly engaged in the pursuit of a proper balance between saving jobs, protecting the environment and ensuring the health of our communities.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em><br />
</em></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/sen-byrd-splits-with-rocky-iv-on-bill-to-block-epa-from-issuing-greenhouse-gas-limits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rocky IV seeks more delay in greenhouse gas controls, but offers no plan of his own</title>
		<link>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/rocky-iv-seeks-more-delay-in-greenhouse-gas-controls-but-offers-no-plan-of-his-own/</link>
		<comments>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/rocky-iv-seeks-more-delay-in-greenhouse-gas-controls-but-offers-no-plan-of-his-own/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Coal Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decision Maker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epa Administrator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Environmental Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Rockefeller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rocky Iv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Mine Workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Mine Workers Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willingness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ken Ward Jr. West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller today is introducing legislation seeking to delay — for two years — any federal limits on greenhouse gas emissions. Rockefeller says his bill aims to give Congress: … The time it needs to address an issue as complicated and expansive as our energy future … Congress, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/files/2009/09/rockychange1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1174 alignleft" style="margin: 10px;" src="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/files/2009/09/rockychange1.jpg" alt="rockychange1" width="299" height="294" /></a><small>by Ken Ward Jr.</small></h3>
<p>West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller today is introducing <a href="http://rockefeller.senate.gov/press/ARP10100.pdf">legislation</a> seeking to delay — <em><strong>for two years</strong></em> — any federal limits on greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p>Rockefeller says his bill aims to give Congress:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em> … The time it needs to address an issue as complicated and expansive as our energy future … Congress, not the EPA, must be the ideal decision-maker on such a challenging issue.</em></p>
<p>West Virginia’s senator previously <a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2010/02/22/rocky-iv-joins-charge-against-epa-greenhouse-rules/">joined the charge</a> against any effort by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to regulate greenhouse emissions, something the U.S. Supreme Court has said <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency">EPA clearly has the authority</a> (the obligation, actually, if you bother to read <a href="http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/endangerment.html">EPA’s endangerment finding</a>) to do.</p>
<p>Rockefeller’s legislation is available online <a href="http://rockefeller.senate.gov/press/ARP10100.pdf">here</a>, as is a previous <a href="http://rockefeller.senate.gov/press/Letter%20to%20Lisa%20Jackson%202-19-10.pdf">letter from the senator</a> to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson and <a href="http://rockefeller.senate.gov/press/Jackson%20response%20letter.pdf">Jackson’s reply</a>. Rockefeller said:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Two weeks ago, I sent a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson challenging EPA’s potential regulation of greenhouse gases. Administrator Jackson responded quickly and showed some willingness to move the agency’s timetable for regulation to the end of 2010.  This is a positive change and good progress, but I am concerned it may not be enough time. We must set this delay in stone and give Congress enough time to consider a comprehensive energy bill to develop the clean coal technologies we need.  At a time when so many people are hurting, we need to put decisions about clean coal and our energy future into the hands of the people and their elected representatives, not a federal environmental agency.</em></p>
<p>Of course, the problem with what Rockefeller is doing is that the House of Representatives <a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2009/05/18/waxman-markey-update-a-global-warming-crossroads/">has already passed climate change legislation</a> — a bill that the United Mine Workers of America union said provides a “remarkable” amount of “clean coal” money and ensures “<a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2009/06/26/wva-and-global-warming-coal-wins-another-round/">the future of coal will be intact</a>.”</p>
<p>But that hasn’t stopped Reps. Nick J. Rahall and Alan Mollohan, D-W.Va., and Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Va., from introducing companion legislation in the House of Representatives.</p>
<p>Politically, many progressive voices in the coal industry — including American Electric Power and the United Mine Workers — have pointed to the threat of EPA action on greenhouse gases as a strong reason for Congress itself to act. Without that threat of EPA rules hanging over its head, will Congress step up and do something?</p>
<p>Odd, isn’t it, that the background materials issued by Rockefeller’s office on this legislation didn’t include any draft of the senator’s own plan to actually do something about climate change, rather than just delay for the sake of the coal industry?</p>
<p><em><br />
</em></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2010/03/04/rocky-iv-seeks-more-delay-in-greenhouse-gas-controls-but-offers-no-plan-of-his-own/"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/rocky-iv-seeks-more-delay-in-greenhouse-gas-controls-but-offers-no-plan-of-his-own/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military exposure bills approved by Veterans’ Committee</title>
		<link>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/military-exposure-bills-approved-by-veterans%e2%80%99-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/military-exposure-bills-approved-by-veterans%e2%80%99-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charleston Gazette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clevenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineer Battalion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf War Veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazardous Materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Authorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeless Veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homelessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improving Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Rockefeller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sodium Dichromate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxic Chemical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia National Guard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia National Guard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women In Uniform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Andrew Clevenger Last week, the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs approved two bills geared towards improving health care and homelessness for veterans, particularly those who may have been exposed to hazardous materials during their service. You can read the press release here. Particularly of note, the Homeless Veterans and Other Health Care Authorities [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="content_inner">
<p class="post_author"><em>by</em> Andrew Clevenger</p>
<div class="format_text">
<p><a title="rockefellercolor.jpg" href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/files/2009/04/rockefellercolor.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/files/2009/04/rockefellercolor.thumbnail.jpg" border="6" alt="rockefellercolor.jpg" hspace="6" vspace="6" align="left" /></a>Last week, the <a href="http://veterans.senate.gov/">U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs</a> approved two bills geared towards improving health care and homelessness for veterans, particularly those who may have been exposed to hazardous materials during their service. You can read the press release <a href="http://veterans.senate.gov/press-releases.cfm?action=release.display&amp;release_id=4342b877-88ab-4b83-970b-9879c94bc7a4">here</a>.</p>
<p>Particularly of note, the Homeless Veterans and Other Health Care Authorities Act of 2010 contains provisions that extends health care eligibility for Gulf War veterans until 2012, “including those exposed to sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali.”</p>
<p>As the <a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2009/10/07/toxic-time-bomb/">Gazette and others have reported</a>, those exposed to the <a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2009/10/14/sodium-dichromate-update/">toxic chemical at the Qarmat Ali</a> water plant included members members of the West Virginia National Guard’s 1092nd Engineer Battalion.</p>
<p>Sen. <a href="http://rockefeller.senate.gov/">Jay Rockefeller</a>, who serves on the Veterans’ Committee, issued the following <a href="http://rockefeller.senate.gov/press/record.cfm?id=321952&amp;">statement</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>For years, these soldiers were kept in the dark — not told about their exposure and left to fend for themselves. Today, they are struggling to get the health care they need and deserve — that is absolutely deplorable. This week’s comprehensive legislation is an important step forward and makes clear that we will fight for the men and women in uniform who put their lives on the line every day. </em></p></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2010/02/02/military-exposure-bills-approved-by-veterans-committee/">Blogs @ The Charleston Gazette</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/military-exposure-bills-approved-by-veterans%e2%80%99-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Chemical Safety Board confused about its mission?</title>
		<link>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/is-the-chemical-safety-board-confused-about-its-mission/</link>
		<comments>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/is-the-chemical-safety-board-confused-about-its-mission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ap Photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayer Cropscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board Chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chairman John]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charleston Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charleston Gazette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical Safety Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Csb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Explosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Chance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage Vessel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trajectory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment Tank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valley Residents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/?p=446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ken Ward Jr. Last April, U.S. Chemical Safety Board Chairman John Bresland promised Kanawha Valley residents a complete investigation of the August 2008 explosion and fire that killed two Institute plant workers — and he made clear the CSB would get to the bottom of what kind of disaster might have happened that night. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>by</em> Ken Ward Jr.</p>
<div class="format_text">
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 343px"><a title="bayerblastt.jpg" href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/files/2009/04/bayerblastt.jpg"><img title="P photo by Tom Hindman, Charleston Daily Mail, of the Aug. 28, 2008 explosion and fire at Bayer CropScience in Institute, W.Va." src="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/files/2009/04/bayerblastt.jpg" alt="bayerblastt.jpg" width="333" height="220" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">AP photo by Tom Hindman, Charleston Daily Mail, of the Aug. 28, 2008 explosion and fire at Bayer CropScience in Institute, W.Va.</p></div>
<p><a title="bio_bresland_112wx156h.jpg" href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/files/2009/03/bio_bresland_112wx156h.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/files/2009/03/bio_bresland_112wx156h.thumbnail.jpg" alt="bio_bresland_112wx156h.jpg" hspace="6" vspace="6" align="right" /></a>Last April, <a href="http://www.csb.gov/">U.S. Chemical Safety Board</a> Chairman John Bresland promised Kanawha Valley residents a complete investigation of the August 2008 explosion and fire that killed two Institute plant workers — and he made clear the CSB would get to the bottom of what kind of disaster might have happened that night.</p>
<p>Bresland <a href="http://www.csb.gov/UserFiles/file/news/BreslandBayerCombinedTestimony.pdf">told a congressional committee</a> that it was vital for his agency to get to the bottom of the damage that could have occurred if a waste treatment tank had been rocketed into a nearby MIC storage vessel:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>As far as we can determine, the direction the residue treater traveled<br />
was a  matter of random chance. The violent rupture of the vessel might<br />
have  propelled it horizontally in any direction or upward on an  arc-like<br />
trajectory.</em></p>
<p><em>Although the MIC tank and the blast mat escaped  serious damage on August<br />
28, there is reason for concern. This was  potentially a serious near<br />
miss, the results of which might have been  catastrophic for workers,<br />
responders and the public.</em></p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Complete Article at <a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2010/01/18/is-the-chemical-safety-board-confused-about-its-mission/">Blogs @ The Charleston Gazette</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/is-the-chemical-safety-board-confused-about-its-mission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Despite EPA deal, Massey water violations more frequent</title>
		<link>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/blogs-the-charleston-gazette-%c2%bb-despite-epa-deal-massey-water-violations-more-frequent/</link>
		<comments>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/blogs-the-charleston-gazette-%c2%bb-despite-epa-deal-massey-water-violations-more-frequent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charleston Gazette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen Groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Water Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal River Mountain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Environmental Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effluent Limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gazette Photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massey Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massey Energy Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notice Of Intent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ovec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sierra Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Violations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia Department Of Environmental Protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ken Ward Jr. Two years ago, when the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reached a record $20 million Clean Water Act settlement with Massey Energy, this was the lead of my Gazette story on the deal: Federal environmental regulators believe a record $20 million fine, new pollution monitoring requirements and the threat of automatic penalties for additional [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; line-height: normal; font-size: 10px; color: #333333;"> </span></p>
<p class="post_author" style="font-size: 1.2em; line-height: 1.1em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.66667em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 10px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 10px; color: #999999;"><em>by</em> Ken Ward Jr.</p>
<div class="format_text" style="font-size: 1.3em; line-height: 1.53846em; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 10px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 10px;">
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;"><a style="color: #237fa1; text-decoration: underline;" title="blankenship_ap.jpg" href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/files/2009/04/blankenship_ap.jpg"><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 10px;" src="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/files/2009/04/blankenship_ap.jpg" alt="blankenship_ap.jpg" width="240" height="200" /></a></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;">Two years ago, when the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency <a style="color: #237fa1; text-decoration: underline;" href="http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/b1ab9f485b098972852562e7004dc686/6944ea38b888dd03852573d3005074ba!OpenDocument">reached a record $20 million Clean Water Act settlement</a> with Massey Energy, this was the lead of <a style="color: #237fa1; text-decoration: underline;" href="http://www.wvgazette.com/News/MiningtheMountains/201001110199">my Gazette story on the deal</a>:</p>
<blockquote style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; color: #555555; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 10px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 10px; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #eeeeee;">
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;"><em>Federal environmental regulators believe a record $20 million fine, new pollution monitoring requirements and the threat of automatic penalties for additional violations will force Massey Energy co. to change the way it does business.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;">Well … it hasn’t turned out that way, at least according to a new formal Notice of Intent to Sue sent to Massey last week by the Sierra Club, the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Coal River Mountain Watch and the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;">According to the legal notice, which I’ve posted <a style="color: #237fa1; text-decoration: underline;" href="http://wvgazette.com/static/coal%20tattoo/60-day%20NOI%20to%20Massey_signed.pdf">here</a>:</p>
<blockquote style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; color: #555555; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 10px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 10px; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #eeeeee;">
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;"><em>Remarkably, Massey’s violations have grown more frequent after the settlement with EPA than they were before EPA brought its enforcement action.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 340px"><a style="color: #237fa1; text-decoration: underline;" title="rally12_i090907204958.jpg" href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/files/2009/09/rally12_i090907204958.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px;" src="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/files/2009/09/rally12_i090907204958.jpg" alt="rally12_i090907204958.jpg" width="330" height="209" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Gazette photo by Chip Ellis</p></div>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;"><span id="more-1653"> </span></p>
<blockquote style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; color: #555555; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 10px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 10px; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #eeeeee;">
<blockquote style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; color: #555555; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 10px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 10px; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #eeeeee;">
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif;">Specifically, the notice alleges that, Between April 1, 2008, and March 31, 2009, Massey violated its effluent limits at its various operations at least 971 times, and accrued 12,977 days of violation during that 12-month period. The <a style="color: #237fa1; text-decoration: underline;" href="http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/cases/civil/cwa/massey.html">U.S. government’s lawsuit against Massey</a>, which resulted in the $20 million settlement, alleged more than 60,000 violations over a six-year period, or about 10,000 violations per year.</span></p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;">The legal notice warns Massey that the citizen groups plan to file a lawsuit against the company, seeking civil penalties and a court order that Massey stop the violations.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;"><a style="color: #237fa1; text-decoration: underline;" href="http://action.sierraclub.org/site/MessageViewer?em_id=152161.0&amp;dlv_id=131641">Diane Bady of OVEC said</a>:</p>
<blockquote style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; color: #555555; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 10px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 10px; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #eeeeee;">
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;"><em>Massey seems to think that poisoning water by consistently ignoring laws is an acceptable business practice. The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection seems to agree, as they continue to allow these violations. We are forced to do the agencies job, to hold Massey accountable.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">I’ve asked Massey officials for a comment, and will update this post when I hear from them.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">UPDATED … Massey issued the following statement:</span></p>
<blockquote style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; color: #555555; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 10px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 10px; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #eeeeee;">
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.53846em; margin-left: 0px;"><em><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">The Company just received notice of a potential lawsuit and is currently reviewing the allegations.  On first review, the data and conclusions in the notice appear to be significantly incorrect.  The Company’s compliance rate is well above 99%.</span></em></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p><em>The threatened suit is but another attempt by out of state extremists to attack the coal industry, which works hard to provide domestic energy and domestic jobs.  The Company is evaluating its legal options with respect to the inaccurate statements from these groups.</em></p>
<p>More - <a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2010/01/11/despite-epa-deal-massey-water-violations-more-frequent/">Blogs @ The Charleston Gazette &#8211;  » Despite EPA deal, Massey water violations more frequent</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/blogs-the-charleston-gazette-%c2%bb-despite-epa-deal-massey-water-violations-more-frequent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA moves to set stage for regulations</title>
		<link>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/epa-moves-to-set-stage-for-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/epa-moves-to-set-stage-for-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Burdens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bumb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical Giant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Action Suits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dupont Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epa Administrator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Appeals Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jersey Residents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laboratory Animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Late September]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strict Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxic Chemicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ken Ward Jr. Word just in today that a federal appeals court has declined to consider DuPont Co.’s appeal of a district judge’s decision that allowed New Jersey residents to pursue claims of private nuisance and strict liability as class-action suits against the chemical giant. The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="content_inner">
<p class="post_author"><a title="successtopphoto.gif" href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/files/2009/07/successtopphoto.gif"><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 10px;" src="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/files/2009/07/successtopphoto.gif" alt="successtopphoto.gif" width="302" height="130" /></a><em>by</em> Ken Ward Jr.</p>
<div class="format_text">
<p>Word just in today that a federal appeals court has declined to consider DuPont Co.’s appeal of a district judge’s decision that allowed New Jersey residents to pursue claims of private nuisance and strict liability as class-action suits against the chemical giant.</p>
<p>The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the company’s request that it overturn the <a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2009/10/09/another-judge-heard-from-pfoa-suit-allowed-in-nj/">earlier ruling by U.S. District Judge Renee Marie Bumb</a>. residents are suing DuPont over contamination of their drinking water with ammonium perfluorooctanoate, or PFOA, also known as C8.</p>
<p>But the bigger C8  news today comes from Washington, D.C., where the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency <a href="http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/press1230.pdf">announced its “action plans”</a> for dealing with the growing concerns over four classes of chemicals, including perfluorinated chemicals such as PFOA. EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson had promised these action plans <a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2009/09/29/epa-lists-pfoa-among-chemicals-for-new-reviews/">back in late September</a>, when she announced her agency was stepping up efforts to address the dangers of toxic chemicals and seeking to reform the Toxic Substances and Control Act.</p>
<p>EPA said it “plans to consider initiating rulemaking” under TSCA section 6, which it said “provides authority for EPA to ban or restrict the manufacture (including import), processing and use of these chemicals.</p>
<p>But it appears no such proposals will be forthcoming from EPA until 2012. A summary of EPA’s action plan on perfluorinated chemicals  is available <a href="http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/pfcs.html">here</a> and the entire document <a href="http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/pfcs_action_plan1230_09.pdf">here</a>. The action plan’s conclusion:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>To date, significant adverse effects have not been found in general human population; however, significant adverse effects have been identified in laboratory animals and wildlife. Given the long half-life of these chemicals in humans (years), it can reasonably be anticipated that continued exposure could increase body burdens to levels that would result in adverse outcomes. Consequently, EPA intends to propose actions in 2012 under TSCA to address the potential risks from long-chain PFCs.</em></p></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2009/12/30/pfoa-update-epa-moves-to-set-stage-for-regulations/">Blogs @ The Charleston Gazette &#8211; » PFOA update: EPA moves to set stage for regulations</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/epa-moves-to-set-stage-for-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama EPA moves to tighten smog standard</title>
		<link>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/blogs-the-charleston-gazette-%c2%bb-obama-epa-moves-to-tighten-smog-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/blogs-the-charleston-gazette-%c2%bb-obama-epa-moves-to-tighten-smog-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aggravation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Pollution Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charleston Gazette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epa Administrator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground Level Ozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lung Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lung Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Older Adults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ozone Exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parts Per Million Ppm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plants And Trees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premature Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Previous Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rulemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serious Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ken Ward Jr. In a move that’s been expected since September, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency just announced that it is tightening the nationwide air pollution standards for smog. EPA said: Smog, also known as ground-level ozone, is linked to a number of serious health problems, ranging from aggravation of asthma to increased risk [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="post_author"><a title="stackpollution.jpg" href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/files/2009/04/stackpollution.jpg"><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 10px;" src="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/files/2009/04/stackpollution.jpg" alt="stackpollution.jpg" width="315" height="209" /></a><em>by</em> Ken Ward Jr.</p>
<p>In a move that’s been expected since September, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency <a href="http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/d0cf6618525a9efb85257359003fb69d/d70b9c433c46faa3852576a40058b1d4%21OpenDocument">just announced</a> that it is tightening the nationwide air pollution standards for smog. EPA said:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><span style="font-family: Arial;">Smog, also known as ground-level ozone, is linked to a number of serious health problems, ranging from aggravation of asthma to increased risk of premature death in people with heart or lung disease. Ozone can even harm healthy people who work and play outdoors.</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial;">The agency is proposing to replace the standards set by the previous administration, which many believe were not protective enough of human health</span></em>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Specifically:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><span style="font-family: Arial;">The agency is proposing to set the “primary” standard, which protects public health, at a level between 0.060 and 0.070 parts per million (ppm) measured over eight hours. Children are at the greatest risk from ozone, because their lungs are still developing, they are most likely to be active outdoors, and they are more likely than adults to have asthma.</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"> Adults with asthma or other lung diseases, and older adults are also sensitive to ozone.</span></em><br />
<em><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></em><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><em>EPA is also proposing to set a separate “secondary” standard to protect the environment, especially plants and trees. This seasonal standard is designed to protect plants and trees from damage occurring from repeated ozone exposure, which can reduce tree growth, damage leaves, and increase susceptibility to disease. </em></span></p></blockquote>
<p>The move reserves a Bush administration action, in which then-EPA administrator Stephen Johnson rejected recommendations from an agency clear air advisory panel to tighten the smog standard to somewhere between 60 and 70 parts per billion. Johnson had opted instead for a weaker standard of 75 parts per billion, prompting lawsuits and petitions for reconsideration.</p>
<p>EPA said today that it reversed the Bush rule after:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><span style="font-family: Arial;">EPA conducted a review of the science that guided the 2008 decision, including more than 1,700 scientific studies and public comments from the 2008 rulemaking process. EPA also reviewed the findings of the independent Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, which recommended standards in the ranges proposed today.</span></em></p></blockquote>
<p>More &#8211; <a href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2010/01/07/obama-epa-moves-to-tighten-smog-standard/">Blogs @ The Charleston Gazette</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaydeespost.jaydees.net/index.php/blogs-the-charleston-gazette-%c2%bb-obama-epa-moves-to-tighten-smog-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
